EFFICIENCY OF PHET AND CROCODILE PHYSICS SIMULATORS IN DISTANCE LEARNING PHYSICS FOR ENGINEERING SPECIALTIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30888/2663-5712.2025-34-01-094

Keywords:

Distance learning, simulators, physics, engineering education, virtual experiment, PhET, Crocodile Physics, learning effectiveness.

Abstract

The study investigates the impact of integrating PhET and Crocodile Physics simulations into an online “General Physics” course for engineering undergraduates at Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University during the 2024/2025 academic semester. Two pre-formed

References

Гриньова, М., & Кузьменко, Г. Інтеграція мобільних технологій у фізичну STEM-освіту: можливості та перспективи. Adaptive Management: Theory and Practice. Series Pedagogics. 2025. Т. 20, № 39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0255-20(39)-17.

Ткачук, В., Єчкало, Ю., Хоцкіна, С., Маркова, О., & Хоцкіна, В. Використання імерсивних технологій у підготовці майбутніх інженерів. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems. 2023. Вип. 68. С. 168–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2023-68-168-181.

Jasti, N. V. K., Kota, S., & PB, V. An impact of simulation labs on engineering students' academic performance: a critical Investigation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. 2021. Vol. 19, No. 1. P. 103–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2020-0108.

Safaryan, N. Utilizing virtual laboratories for physics instruction in secondary education: A pedagogical inquiry. Main Issues of Pedagogy and Psychology. 2023. Vol. 10, No. 2. P. 81–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v2i10.10.

Kefalis, C., Skordoulis, C., & Drigas, A. Digital simulations in STEM education: Insights from recent empirical studies, a systematic review. Encyclopedia. 2025. Vol. 5, No. 1. Article 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010010.

May, D., Terkowsky, C., Varney, V., & Boehringer, D. Online laboratories in higher engineering education – solutions, challenges, and future directions from a pedagogical perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2023. Vol. 48, No. 5. P. 779–782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2248820.

Reeves, S. M., & Crippen, K. J. Virtual laboratories in undergraduate science and engineering courses: A systematic review, 2009–2019. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2021. Vol. 30, No. 1. P. 16–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09866-0.

Rehman, N., Zhang, W., Mahmood, A., & Alam, F. Teaching physics with interactive computer simulation at secondary level. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade. 2021. Vol. 14, No. 1. P. 127–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.n1.127-141.

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. The impact of physics education technology (PhET) interactive simulation-based learning on motivation and academic achievement among Malawian physics students. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2023. Vol. 32, No. 1. P. 127–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3.

Kabigting, L. D. C. Computer simulation on teaching and learning of selected topics in physics. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education. 2021. Vol. 2, No. 2. Article e02108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/10909.

Kade, A., Supriyatman, S., Kamaruddin, A., Novia, N., Supriyadi, S., & Husain, S. Exploring technology-driven simulations in practical physics: Insights into mechanical measurements concept. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering. 2024. Vol. 4, No. 3. P. 429–444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v4i3.74411.

Mutawa, A. M., Al Muttawa, J. A. K., & Sruthi, S. The effectiveness of using H5P for undergraduate students in the asynchronous distance learning environment. Applied Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13, No. 8. Article 4983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084983.

Warneri, W., Salam, U., Putri, W. A., Imandari, R. Z., Pratiwi, R. D., & Chairunnisa, T. Utilization, simulation and learning: The virtual laboratory learning media PhET for outcomes learning. JTP-Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan. 2024. Vol. 26, No. 3. P. 960–970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i3.49832.

Chinaka, T. W. The effect of PhET simulation vs. phenomenon-based experiential learning on students’ integration of motion along two independent axes in projectile motion. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2021. Vol. 25, No. 2. P. 185–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2021.1969739.

Poultsakis, S., Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Psycharis, S. The management of digital learning objects of natural sciences and digital experiment simulation tools by teachers. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research. 2021. Vol. 1, No. 2. P. 58–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.02.002

References

Grinova, M., & Kuzmenko, H. (2025). Integration of mobile technologies into physical STEM education: Opportunities and perspectives. Adaptive Management: Theory and Practice. Series Pedagogics, 20(39). https://doi.org/10.33296/2707-0255-20(39)-17

Tkachuk, V., Yechkalo, Y., Khotskina, S., Markova, O., & Khotskina, V. (2023). Use of immersive technologies in training future engineers. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training Methodology Theory Experience Problems, (68), 168-181. https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2023-68-168-181

Jasti, N. V. K., Kota, S., & PB, V. (2021). An impact of simulation labs on engineering students' academic performance: a critical Investigation. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2020-0108

Safaryan, N. (2023). Utilizing virtual laboratories for physics instruction in secondary education: A pedagogical inquiry. Main Issues of Pedagogy and Psychology, 10(2), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.24234/miopap.v2i10.10

Kefalis, C., Skordoulis, C., & Drigas, A. (2025). Digital simulations in STEM education: Insights from recent empirical studies, a systematic review. Encyclopedia, 5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5010010

May, D., Terkowsky, C., Varney, V., & Boehringer, D. (2023). Online laboratories in higher engineering education–solutions, challenges, and future directions from a pedagogical perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48(5), 779-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2248820

Reeves, S. M., & Crippen, K. J. (2021). Virtual laboratories in undergraduate science and engineering courses: A systematic review, 2009–2019. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(1), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09866-0

Rehman, N., Zhang, W., Mahmood, A., & Alam, F. (2021). Teaching physics with interactive computer simulation at secondary level. Cadernos de Educação Tecnologia e Sociedade, 14(1), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v14.n1.127-141

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2023). The impact of physics education technology (PhET) interactive simulation-based learning on motivation and academic achievement among malawian physics students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3

Kabigting, L. D. C. (2021). Computer simulation on teaching and learning of selected topics in physics. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(2), e02108. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/10909

Kade, A., Supriyatman, S., Kamaruddin, A., Novia, N., Supriyadi, S., & Husain, S. (2024). Exploring technology-driven simulations in practical physics: Insights into mechanical measurements concept. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(3), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajse.v4i3.74411

Mutawa, A. M., Al Muttawa, J. A. K., & Sruthi, S. (2023). The effectiveness of using H5P for undergraduate students in the asynchronous distance learning environment. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 4983. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13084983

Warneri, W., Salam, U., Putri, W. A., Imandari, R. Z., Pratiwi, R. D., & Chairunnisa, T. (2024). Utilization, simulation and learning: The virtual laboratory learning media PhET for outcomes learning. JTP-Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 26(3), 960-970. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i3.49832

Chinaka, T. W. (2021). The effect of PhET simulation vs. phenomenon-based experiential learning on students’ integration of motion along two independent axes in projectile motion. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25(2), 185-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2021.1969739

Poultsakis, S., Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Psycharis, S. (2021). The management of digital learning objects of natural sciences and digital experiment simulation tools by teachers. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.02.002

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Мартинова, О. (2025). EFFICIENCY OF PHET AND CROCODILE PHYSICS SIMULATORS IN DISTANCE LEARNING PHYSICS FOR ENGINEERING SPECIALTIES. SWorldJournal, 1(34-01), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.30888/2663-5712.2025-34-01-094

Issue

Section

Articles